"ANYBODY BUT NIESKES"
The St. Croix County District Attorney Debate of 10-18-2016 was attended by about 45 interested voters and several City of Hudson Police officers. Most of the public was respectful during the debate. But some of the attendees had the personality of a scorpion and a simple Hi **** elicited an angry response. Did I mention these angry attendees wore "I like Mike" stickers?
There was heightened security at this civil forum do to a hyper sensitive individual requesting the police presence. The police ratio was projected at one point to be one officer to 10 attendees.
This was a civil event and the police presence was a total waste of police resources.
There was heightened security at this civil forum do to a hyper sensitive individual requesting the police presence. The police ratio was projected at one point to be one officer to 10 attendees.
This was a civil event and the police presence was a total waste of police resources.
During the debate, Nieskes claimed the overwhelming support of law enforcement, but in doing so, failed to mention his affiliation with former Hudson Police Officer John Worden.
Nieskes further went on to defended allegations of his past misconduct, claiming the OLR and the Wisconsin Supreme Court found no wrongdoing of his acts while in Racine County. Well folks consider this, Nieskes and former Calumet County D.A Kenny Kratz go way back. The OLR in it's initial investigation didn't find anything wrong with Kenny's acts either, that is until the public rose against the ever derelict and incompetent OLR.
OLR-Supreme Court Sanctions :
And Nieskes using the choking, scrapping, hair pulling brawling Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices as valid judges ?
They are a national embarrassment as well.
Nieskes would have been be better off not bringing Wisconsin's embarrassing, derelict and incompetent offices into play for his defense.
But then again birds of a feather flock together.
Nieskes during the forum also became a master of excuses of why he missed important community events, defended attacks of corruption and at one point Nieskes asked the audience where is the corruption? An audience member raised his hand to speak, but Nieskes quickly ignored the attempted participation of the audience member. So typical of a narcissist.
Neither candidate brought up the botched, false, and erroneous charges issued by the St. Croix County District Attorneys office against minor Kali Bookey for a murder she didn't commit. Nor did either candidate publicly admonish the ever derelict Judge Lundell for allowing such an a libelous charge of homicide to remain in WCCA public records. A reasonable person reading these WCCA records would believe a murder occurred.
And to further our argument of the St. Croix botched prosecution of minor Kali Bookey, the prosecution moved the minor into adult court before any qualified psychological evaluations were performed. Any first year law student would know better than that.
Then to cover the prosecution's ever derelict and incompetent acts, the D.A.'s office moves to seal the records.
Sarah Yacoub highlighted the need for District Attorney reforms, finding ways to decrease recidivism due to the D.A.'s office of abuse of trumped up excessive bail jumping charges for minor infractions by defendants.
Ms. Yacoub also brought to light the past egregious conduct of Michael Nieskes while acting as District Attorney in Racine County.
Sarah Yacoub failed to mention the criminal complaint filed against Michael Nieskes to the Wisconsin Attorney General Office on
10-27-2011.
The criminal complaint is public record and the complaint includes records tampering, destruction of records and filing a false affidavit into court records - a criminal act.
Fact Check:
Nieskes was rejected by Racine county voters, including over 1,800 voting republicans who crossed party lines to remove the corrupt Nieskes from office and placed Mike Piontec into the Judicial seat.
And to further our argument of the St. Croix botched prosecution of minor Kali Bookey, the prosecution moved the minor into adult court before any qualified psychological evaluations were performed. Any first year law student would know better than that.
Then to cover the prosecution's ever derelict and incompetent acts, the D.A.'s office moves to seal the records.
Sarah Yacoub highlighted the need for District Attorney reforms, finding ways to decrease recidivism due to the D.A.'s office of abuse of trumped up excessive bail jumping charges for minor infractions by defendants.
Ms. Yacoub also brought to light the past egregious conduct of Michael Nieskes while acting as District Attorney in Racine County.
Sarah Yacoub failed to mention the criminal complaint filed against Michael Nieskes to the Wisconsin Attorney General Office on
10-27-2011.
The criminal complaint is public record and the complaint includes records tampering, destruction of records and filing a false affidavit into court records - a criminal act.
Fact Check:
Nieskes was rejected by Racine county voters, including over 1,800 voting republicans who crossed party lines to remove the corrupt Nieskes from office and placed Mike Piontec into the Judicial seat.
Before becoming Judge, Mike Piontec was a trial attorney who was so moved by Nieskes's egregious conduct, that he decided to run for Nieskes's appointed judicial seat.
St. Croix County really needs a Republican candidate who expounds integrity and common sense.
Donna Burger
PLEASE Donna Burger
run as a write in........ PLEASE!
Donna Burger
PLEASE Donna Burger
run as a write in........ PLEASE!
"ANYBODY BUT NIESKES"
Hay mikee how was the debate you are a real masturbator. You talk circles with no real answer . And the excuses why you could not make these appearances. To the things you say are important to you. Imna imna imna HAY ABBOTT. But but it was my dads birthday. Parents anniversary wife’s birthday Dog ate my home work. Nieskes you need more time with the family. Save your self the embarrassment Hudson/ Saint Croix County is Racine. Its like dé·jà vu you can start packing for that family vacation. I am not sure but i think Disneyland needs some new characters the defintion char·ac·ter
ReplyDeleteˈkerəktər/
the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual.