"ANYBODY BUT NIESKES"
The St. Croix District Attorney candidates met for their first public forum last night in New Richmond.
Michael Nieskes was an early arrival entering the debate room, but quickly appeared shaken with the presence of St. Croix County Corruption. So shaken that he immediately left the debate room and we believe called the New Richmond Police department for police presence at the forum.
Hmmmm........ paranoia ?
Since there was no request for law enforcement presence from the fine hosts of the forum,we had a cordial conversation (as it should be) with the arriving officer. The officer stated that his supervisor had a request from an "unknown" person at the event for police presence.
The officer assessed the well organized and orderly forum and left as quickly as he came.
The well organized D.A. forum occurred with civility.
Americanism at its best!
Americanism at its best!
During the debate, Mike Nieskes touted his experience claiming he has over 30 years experience and is the best candidate to keep St. Croix County citizens safe. Mike further stated he has conducted so many trials that he quit counting.
Sarah Yacoub also expressed her extensive trial experience and expressed the need for reforms in the
St. Croix District Attorney's office.
Sarah stated her reforms would include the expansion of the use of drug courts and further expanding the opportunities for citizens to mend their errors by participating in alternative programs, avoiding criminal prosecution for non-violent offenders.
Below we highlight a fundamental difference between the candidates : first read
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2011/12/19/7233/minor-offenders-major-consequences
Now look into Michael Nieskes's latest folly of handling St. Croix County Circuit Court case #2016CF000322
State vs. Kali Bookey.
Nieskes moved a 14 year old into adult court without an evaluation and without any psychological testing. Even a first year law student should know better than that.
What is almost equally offensive is the silence and failure of the Hudson area legal community to denounce and publicly admonish the District Attorney's office and the court for the false charge of homicide, along with the publishing of the false charge on WCCA records.
The most legal way to rid the community of these legal subversives is to vote them out of office.
Voting is not only a privilege, it is a constitutional right in this country. A right that can only remain secure by the thoughtful and informed voting public.
Be that informed and thoughtful voter.
Vote November 8th, 2016
"ANYBODY BUT NIESKES"
Sarah Yacoub also expressed her extensive trial experience and expressed the need for reforms in the
St. Croix District Attorney's office.
Sarah stated her reforms would include the expansion of the use of drug courts and further expanding the opportunities for citizens to mend their errors by participating in alternative programs, avoiding criminal prosecution for non-violent offenders.
Below we highlight a fundamental difference between the candidates : first read
https://www.publicintegrity.org/2011/12/19/7233/minor-offenders-major-consequences
Now look into Michael Nieskes's latest folly of handling St. Croix County Circuit Court case #2016CF000322
State vs. Kali Bookey.
Nieskes moved a 14 year old into adult court without an evaluation and without any psychological testing. Even a first year law student should know better than that.
What is almost equally offensive is the silence and failure of the Hudson area legal community to denounce and publicly admonish the District Attorney's office and the court for the false charge of homicide, along with the publishing of the false charge on WCCA records.
The most legal way to rid the community of these legal subversives is to vote them out of office.
Voting is not only a privilege, it is a constitutional right in this country. A right that can only remain secure by the thoughtful and informed voting public.
Be that informed and thoughtful voter.
Vote November 8th, 2016
"ANYBODY BUT NIESKES"
No comments:
Post a Comment