The Fall of Trust of the
St. Croix judiciary System
State Vs. Kali Bookey
Case # 2016CF000322
The alleged
egregious acts of 14 year old Kali Bookey have been extensively covered by mainstream media
and social media outlets.
And we as
part of the community extend our hearts and prayers to the victim of this
shocking and unthinkable event.
Will the victim of this crime make a full and complete recovery? We
most certainly hope so.
We
understand the communities desire and need to protect the community from such
egregious
conduct.
We further
understand that part of the District Attorney’s office mission is to protect the
community, and should act legally and responsibly to achieve this goal.
But due to negligence and mismanagement in the St. Croix District Attorney's office, another "victim" may be appearing in this case.
This "victim" is the defendant Kali Bookey, a victim of complicity between the St. Croix District Attorney's office and Judge Eric Lundell of the St.Croix County Circuit Court System.
The St. Croix District Attorney's office has wrongly charged Ms. Bookey with homicide when no death occurred in the commission of her alleged crime.
Further Judge Eric Lundell failed to properly vet the complaint forwarded by the District Attorney's office during hearings.
The charge of homicide indicates somebody died, not merely insinuating a death.
But due to negligence and mismanagement in the St. Croix District Attorney's office, another "victim" may be appearing in this case.
This "victim" is the defendant Kali Bookey, a victim of complicity between the St. Croix District Attorney's office and Judge Eric Lundell of the St.Croix County Circuit Court System.
The St. Croix District Attorney's office has wrongly charged Ms. Bookey with homicide when no death occurred in the commission of her alleged crime.
Further Judge Eric Lundell failed to properly vet the complaint forwarded by the District Attorney's office during hearings.
The charge of homicide indicates somebody died, not merely insinuating a death.
Why has A.D.A. Alexis Mckinley brought forth charges that she cannot
prove in court?
For the District
Attorney’s office to bring forth charges against a defendant that it cannot prove in court is negligent, unethical, malicious and further lacks
candor towards the tribunal.
Now don't get the idea we are condoning Ms. Bookey acts, as we are not.
Ms. Bookey appears to have some serious issues, but she may grow out of her issues as her brain continues to develope as she ages.
But what are the excuses of the adults in the D.A.'s office committing the wrongful and negligent act of mischarging?
District Attorney Eric Johnson has over 30 years experience as District Attorney
and Deputy District Attorney Michael Nieskes also has extensive experience.
Is this a pattern and practice of negligence and abuse of power by the St. Croix District Attorney's office that has now come to light?
Now don't get the idea we are condoning Ms. Bookey acts, as we are not.
Ms. Bookey appears to have some serious issues, but she may grow out of her issues as her brain continues to develope as she ages.
But what are the excuses of the adults in the D.A.'s office committing the wrongful and negligent act of mischarging?
District Attorney Eric Johnson has over 30 years experience as District Attorney
and Deputy District Attorney Michael Nieskes also has extensive experience.
Is this a pattern and practice of negligence and abuse of power by the St. Croix District Attorney's office that has now come to light?
This case is
barely out of arraignment and there are
already many legal issues of errors, acts, omissions, negligence and complicity
committed by the District Attorney’s office.
But why has
the media neglected to illuminate these apparent failings of the
St Croix District Attorney’s office?
And why has
the media failed to report the apparent acts of complicity by Judge Eric
Lundell of the St. Croix County Circuit Court ?
We currently don't know the answers to these questions.
We are only laymen at St. Croix County Corruption, with no formal legal training, but we will make inquiries.
But we do have lots of experience exposing wrongful acts by government employees and we know how to publish those acts.
We currently don't know the answers to these questions.
We are only laymen at St. Croix County Corruption, with no formal legal training, but we will make inquiries.
But we do have lots of experience exposing wrongful acts by government employees and we know how to publish those acts.
Kali Bookey,
a minor in St. Croix County has been wrongly charged by the St. Croix District Attorney’s office with Wisconsin
Statute 940.01(1)(a).
Wisconsin Statute
940.01(1)(a) reads:
940.01 First-degree intentional homicide
(1) offenses
(a) Except as provided is sub. (2), whoever causes the death of another human being with intent to kill that person or another is guilty of a Class A felony.
9
The problem
with this case for the D.A.'s office is that there is no death associated with
St. Croix case # 16CF322.
That’s right
!
No cadaver !
No corpse !
No dead body!
NILL - Nada -
Zip - Zapata
That means
the District Attorney’s office knowingly filed a complaint that it knows it
cannot prove in court.
To exacerbate the wrongful acts of District Attorney’s Eric Johnson’s and Deputy District Attorney Michael Nieskes
‘s apparent mismanagement of this case,
Judge Eric Lundell failed to properly vet, question and scrutinize the false charges.
Are we to believe that Judge Eric Lundell is so removed from reality that he is the only person in St. Croix County that is unaware that no death occurred in this case?
When we talk
about judicial systems that is corrupt to the core, the St. Croix County
Judiciary system appears to be in need for a major cleansing.
We deplore the management style of deception by District Attorney Eric Johnson and Deputy District Attorney Michael Nieskes.
"Anybody but Nieskes"
"the Un campaign "
The D. A.'s office has already mismanaged this case by wrongly charging Ms. Bookey of a crime it cannot prove.
The negligent act of charging the defendant with a crime
they knowingly cannot prove
in an honest court is both immoral and unethical.
Judge Eric Lundell appeared to act complicit with the D.A.'s office and failed to ascertain probable cause that a death occurred.
But Hey,
who said Judge Eric Lundell runs an
honest court?
honest court?
Every body no's Judge Ear ache Lundell makes up the law has he go's. Lundell has more law clerk and still cant get it right. You think after 35 some years on the bench he would no the law. Now he has the dirty DA from Racine. The unelected DA promoted for his bad behavior. The one and only incompetent retracting redacting court record sealing falsifying document record holder. With over 100 pages of complaints filed with the attorney generals office. In just under 20 months the unemployable joke of the law community Racine's reject Saint Croixs Boy the newest addition to the corruption team Michael Nieskes starring Eric Judge Lundell. Remember this guy tried to sue the town of Hudson. When his son hit a pot hole in the family car. He wrecked a tire so he had to buy 3 more. To match the one that was bad then the tie rod total $1,432.00 to bad he lost. The Judge of that case was not part of his corrupted ream team
ReplyDelete